I'm really not too sure what to make of this article. It appears to suggest that the original prosecution has been set aside, on a Shropshire woman who had found a 'coin' and not handed it in as 'Treasure'.
This really is quite an unusual case, as all detectorists know that single coins are not 'Treasure'.
I have discussed this previously in my blog, so I won't cover old ground.
Here is the article
No comments:
Post a Comment